Monday, April 25, 2011

Listening to the Earth

I have two readings this morning. The first reading is the opening monologue of a play by Paul Zindel entitled The Effect of Gamma Rays on Man-in-the-Moon Marigolds.

He told me to look at my hand for a part of it came from a star that exploded too long ago to imagine. This part of me was formed from a tongue of fire that screamed though the heavens until there was our sun. And this part of me—this tiny part of me—was on the sun when it itself exploded and whirled into a great storm until the planets came to be. And this small part of me was then a whisper of the earth. When there was life perhaps this part of me got lost in a fern that was crushed and covered until it was coal. And then it was a diamond millions of years later—it must have been a diamond as beautiful as the star from which it had first come. Or perhaps this part of me got lost in a terrible beast, or became part of a huge bird that flew above the primeval swamps. And he said this thing was so small—this part of me was so small it couldn’t be seen—but it was there from the beginning of the world.

The second reading comes from a book by David Abram called The Spell of the Sensuous.

To touch the coarse skin of a tree is thus, at the same time, is to experience one’s own tactility, to feel oneself touched by the tree. And to see the world is also, at the same time, to experience oneself as visible, to feel oneself seen.…We can experience things—can touch, hear, and taste things—only because, as bodies, we are ourselves included in the sensible field, and have our own textures, sounds, and tastes. We can perceive things at all only because we ourselves are entirely a part of the sensible world we perceive. We might as well say that we are organs of this world, flesh of its flesh and that the world is perceiving itself through us.

I have heard it told though I do not know if it is true, in Japanese, the sentence “I see the dog” would translate as “I dog seeing” to acknowledge the perception of both dog and person. David Abram suggests the world perceives itself through us in the same way we rely on our eyes, ears, nose, mouth and skin to perceive the world.

The playwright Paul Zindel notes the atoms that comprise us come from stardust. If our atoms are whispers of the earth and we in our totality function as the earth’s ears, listening to the earth takes on new urgency.
Jim Nollman, who has been making music with orcas, dolphins, wolves, turkeys and other animals for more than twenty-five years, said in an interview,

I have a lot of friends around the world who are able to actually hear the natural world. Still, whether or not we hear, listening is important. Until we start to listen—and, I hope eventually hear—the natural world for ourselves, nonhumans will be regarded as objects. Just the act of trying to listen can change a lot of our perceptions about nature and that can change the way we live.

What would change if we listen to shale as we hydrofracture it to release its natural gas? Here’s the process involved, also known as “fracking.”

First a drilling rig will dig a vertical hole several thousand feet deep, gradually bending until the concrete-encased well reaches the shale layer. After burrowing horizontally for as much as a mile (1.6 km), the drillers lower a perforating gun down to the end of the well. That gun fires off explosions underground that pierce the concrete and open up microfractures in the shale. The drillers then shoot millions of gallons of highly pressurized water, mixed with sand and small amounts of additives known as fracking chemicals, down the well, widening the shale fractures. Natural pressure forces the liquids back up the well, producing what's known as flowback, and the gas rushes from the fractures into the pipe. The grains of sand included in the fracking fluid keep the shale cracks open — like stents in a clogged blood vessel — while the well produces gas for years, along with a steadily decreasing amount of wastewater from deep inside the shale.

I pose this question neither rhetorically nor poetically. Does the earth whisper as this happens—or roar? Can we hear ourselves in the sound of the shale yielding to five million gallons of highly pressurized water forcing gas through its cracks? Or in the sound of the Tokyo Electric Power Company “releasing more than 11,000 tons of radioactive water used to cool fuel rods into the ocean [or] water vastly more radioactive gush[ing] into the ocean through a large crack in a six-foot deep pit at the [Fukushima Daiichi] nuclear plant” ?

I dog seeing.
We earth speaking.
Listening earth we?

The poet Rilke writes to God:

At my senses’ horizon
you appear hesitantly,
like scattered islands.

Yet standing here, peering out,
I’m all the time seen by you.…

All creation holds its breath, listening within me,
Because, to hear you, I keep silent.

The contemporary writer and environmental activist Derrick Jensen chronicles feeling swept away by a “future that looks dark, and darker with each passing species,” until he looked closely, and saw one blade of wild grass and then another…and heard the hum of flies…and saw ants walking single file through the dust…and knew in that moment…that it is no longer possible to be lonely, that every creature on earth is pulling in the direction of life—every grasshopper, every struggling salmon, every unhatched chick, every cell of every blue whale—and it is only our fear that sets us apart.

Is it fear that prevents us from listening?

I have had the experience after an injury or surgery of not wanting to look at the wounded part. There is something disconcerting in trying to reconcile the sight or sound of injury in oneself.

“He told me to look at my hand for a part of it came from a star that exploded too long ago to imagine…formed from a tongue of fire that screamed though the heavens … And this small part of me was then a whisper of the earth.”

It is difficult to listen to our own cries in the heaving; in the grieving earth. Bitter to taste iodine 131 or the salt of our tears. Painful to feel eruptions of skin and tectonic plate. Easier to turn away, to withdraw our touch, seal our lips, close our eyes, cover our ears than to listen to the sweep of the tsunami as it swallows villages whole, or the detonation of the mountaintop swept away for coal.

It is easier perhaps to tune out the real sounds, replace them with noise: talk radio and jabber TV, the audible posturing of politicians along coordinates of bluster and denial.

Derrick Jensen asks: “If salmon, tuna, or wolverine could take on human manifestation, what would they do?”

What would they hear in fracturing shale and exploding water? What would we hear in ourselves if we could take on the manifestation of tuna, salmon, wolverine? Ocean? Mountaintop, old growth forest?
David Abram explains in his book The Spell of the Sensuous, once humans developed phonetic alphabets we no longer relied on pictographs, images that connected us to our “sensory participation with the enveloping natural field.” Whereas we used to depend on images tied to our interaction with other species and the elements, now “each letter [is] purely associated with a gesture or sound of the human mouth.” Our written images no longer “function as windows opening onto a more-than-human field of powers but solely as mirrors reflecting the human form back on itself.”

The downside of mirrors is that they never offer the entire view.

We can romanticize the earth by conceiving of it as a paramour—a lover we dote on or worse, use to gratify our desires; but the earth is not something we choose to love; it is what we are. Earth is our provenance. We carry it in our cells as much as we are carried by it.

We’ve all been in situations when we needed to listen to ourselves, heed that inner voice, but we didn’t. Instead we tuned into old tapes, social pressures, cultural tropes. By the time I was thirty-eight, living alone and loving it, I knew I was happiest living by myself, blessed with wonderful friends and family and work I enjoyed, but I kept turning the volume down on that voice of clarity deep inside. I would get into a relationship and move in and move out and disrupt and distract myself from what I loved and what nourished me. It took me another ten years to finally listen.

Tuning out the earth is the quickest way to disruption and destruction. We lose touch not just with the beauty of the earth, the power of creativity, and “our place in the family of things.” We lose touch with ourselves and the parts of us that belong to “a star that exploded too long ago to imagine.” We lose touch with the red hills and red river valley, the canyons and the salmon swimming upstream and the orcas singing with us.
Jim Tollman, the man who makes music with non-human collaborators explains the benefit he gets from listening intently.

I experience a sense of grace. That's what communication with nonhumans is really all about. When communication happens, no matter how subtle it is, no matter if it doesn't register on some meter, or on tape or on film, I feel as though I've been blessed. It is the greatest blessing of my life. In some very basic way, I suppose it's the same thing that other people experience through religion.… I've always felt that the primary purpose of religion is not intellectual, for instance to explain a mysterious universe we can never really know. It's sensuous, a feeling that places us in a situation where blessing can occur. When that happens, however it happens, the universe suddenly seems less distant. We all need that experience, whether we find it though religion, or through playing music with whales.

When we turn soil and plant seeds, tend a garden, our hands hear the earth and we feel the connection. The seasons, the cycles, the thrum of life reclaims us as we stake ourselves not to the ground but with it. We join together in communion—a community of union that refastens us to the holy within ourselves.
That’s what listening to the earth and for the earth does. To touch the bark of a tree, the fur of animal, the grit of dirt is to feel our own tactility, ourselves being touched back. Held in the embrace of a world that includes us and comprises us and in turn, allows us to be its eyes and ears, its fingers, mouth and nose.

The grains of sand in fracking fluid, the radioactive waters flowing from Japan, the vanished mountaintops of Appalachia beckon us to be their eyes and ears, to see and hear in them the obstruction and absence that diminish our earthliness.

“All creation holds its breath, listening within [us].”
We earth being.
Amen.

Monday, April 4, 2011

The World According to Autism

My sister, Sand, called me last week to tell me April is Autism Awareness Month, with yesterday, the 2nd, designated Autism Awareness Day. I asked her if she wanted to offer a testimonial. She declined because she is not comfortable speaking in public but she agreed to write about her experience.

Autism seems worthy of a sermon not just because one in 110 children receives a diagnosis somewhere along the autism spectrum, not simply because more and more adults with Asperger’s Syndrome, a milder form of autism, are penning memoirs and in the case of Temple Grandin, multiple books. Autism reframes ordinary experiences non-autistic or neuro-typical folks take for granted. Peering through the lens of autism allows us to glimpse our world from a different angle. That is where the spiritual value of a sermon lies.

Whenever we cling to a singular vision we risk becoming entrenched and entitled. We chance a fundamentalism of our own making if we become purveyors of a singular truth enabled by a singular view. What seems apparent, even inarguably evident from our perspective is often not the case from someone else’s. In Libya, rebels fight to overthrow a despot and his supporters fight to retain a leader who has provided stability. The U.S. military forms part of a NATO coalition to protect Libyan civilians from attacks by weapons the U.S. sold Qaddafi.

We live with and within a multiplicity not a singularity or duality of perspectives; autism provides a useful, less politically charged way of remembering that.
When my sister and I went to lunch last Monday, she handed me four carefully handwritten pages entitled “My World with Autism,” or “Coping through the World of Autism.” Her titles alone are instructive. It is in fact, her world, a world shaped by the autism she experiences markedly different from ours. “Coping through the World of Autism” evokes a series of passageways to be negotiated, rather than a series of experiences to be savored.

I have edited her remarks for concision but otherwise I present to you what she wrote.

Since I suffer from Asperger’s Syndrome which is one of the most common forms of autism, I interpret the world differently. I am not able to understand what people say to me often because I take everything literally, I am not able to understand when people joke or kid around with me, or people’s sense of humor. I cannot interpret facial expression, read body language, or understand nonverbal cues socially or otherwise; therefore I have great difficulty understanding nonverbal communication. I can only process information at a concrete not abstract level so that’s why I take everything literally. I am only able to process verbal, literal communication.

Consider for a moment the nature of my sermons. As you know, I rely on metaphor. Two weeks ago, I quoted from another Unitarian Universalist’s sermon identifying figurative language as the hallmark of our liberal faith. This is why in large measure, my sister will not worship here. It’s not just that she prefers the lively beat of praise music and the repetition her pastor employs in his preaching style: it’s that she worships in a context of literalism. The Bible is understood as the literal word of God. The stories aren’t metaphors meant to be untangled by critical, abstract thinking. They are admonitions and examples to be followed by the devout.

The figurative world we inhabit so rich with subtlety and metaphor is a planet inaccessible to my sister. The faith that gives us room to worship freely locks her out.

Consider the onslaught of nonverbal cues and subliminal advertising we are expected to read along with the nuance of facial expressions, body language and social cues in order to successfully interact and professionally advance. Now imagine being illiterate—unable to decipher any of the signposts in everyday life. Erase being able to read tone of voice, facetiousness, sarcasm, irony, expressions, gestures, even posture.

Suddenly the world becomes a foreboding and forbidding place.
Sand continues:

"I have difficulty in social situations due to not understanding what people say to me and not being able to handle words, or too much auditory and visual information. I have severe sensory issues, a major characteristic of autism; therefore I can’t tolerate too much auditory or visual input and I have severe sensitivity to touching or being touched. With over-stimulation I get overwhelmed, which causes a sensory overload. I get headaches, I get upset and angry very quickly and I can’t put my mind at ease. It can take me anywhere from ten minutes to ten or twelve days to overcome a sensory overload.

Due to my autism, I do not do well with change or surprises. I thrive on structure and routine; when there is a change I get upset and overwhelmed. I am learning to cope with this issue by understanding change is part of life whether it is sudden or not. I thrive on sameness. One important aspect for people with autism is a predictable environment—knowing what to expect and the order in which things will occur.

I am learning by working with children who have autism just how imperative this is. I have great difficulty with the need to have constant reassurance, for example, if I have something scheduled I have a tendency to ask if the appointment is still on or if the plan is still taking place. I do not do well with uncertainty at all."

Many of us don’t but we adapt more readily. We all like to feel assured our lunch date hasn’t forgotten us or the appointment hasn’t been changed but we don’t need to call five times to make sure. Given the rapid pace of change technologically and practically the world becomes a whirlwind of uncertainty. Note the use of obstructionist metaphor there.

Sand continues:
"When I do not have reassurance about what is happening that causes me to become very disorganized and upset. I tend to get angry because I live as though my life is then unsettled. This doesn’t happen out of meanness; it is just the way I respond emotionally. These same emotions arise when there is a change in my routine or a surprise. That really puts my system off base and my response is to automatically get angry and upset. It takes time to recover."

More weeks than not my sister spends at least a day if not two or three recovering in bed. For Sand, it’s not just surprise parties or unannounced visits that unnerve her; any variation, even a suggestion that would save her money or time, if it requires deviating from her route or routine, rattles her. The underpinnings of her world are precarious enough; the slightest shift to them threatens a tectonic eruption no less consequential to her than the actual earthquake was to Japan. In my frustration at her inability to focus outwardly, I try to draw her attention to the crisis in Japan or the unrest across the Middle East, but she can’t go there. She has told me time and again empathy is extremely difficult for people with autism to feel. As she says it is not out of meanness, but limitation imposed by living her life on high alert.

If we consider what it might be like to be bound to literalism, to perceive the world in gradations of threat; if we sit for a moment imagining what it would be like to experience this worship service as a sensory assault: the crescendo of the organ, the barrage of words, unpredictable movements as people rise to make an announcement or light a candle, the sudden return of the children from downstairs, a handshake offered, or worse a hug—if we can conceive that what comforts, inspires, consoles us could unhinge another, we begin to understand the limits of using ourselves and our own preferences as a reference point for anyone else. It’s human of course to do that. To think, I like to have this so I’ll get one for you. I’d love it if my friends drop by so I’ll stop in on my way home. I enjoy worshipping this way so this is the best way to do it.

Just as political choices and military decisions reflect social location, economic advantage or lack thereof, personal history and future interests, the shape of religious community and spiritual practices do, too. As we consider the direction this congregation will take, let us consider what the inclusion we seek would really mean.

A recent newspaper article addressed reasons Sunday morning in church continues, in the words of Martin Luther King, Jr, to be the most segregated hour on earth. Most congregations remain homogeneous. Primarily white or Latino, African-American or Korean, and to some extent divisions remain in some churches around class. In most cases, according to the report, primarily white churches want to be multicultural but the difference in worship and music styles as well as variations in culturally held values accounts for the lack of successful integration. We may want others to experience what we enjoy, but we forget that our pleasure may be their dissatisfaction. For me, there is no better reminder of this than spending time with my sister, Sand.

Any change to worship style will include some and alienate others, but we might think about the additional ministries we could offer that might reach a wider range of people. To be able to plant seeds methodically in rows or walk the familiar pattern of a labyrinth, to create space for quiet contemplation alone or with others throughout the week would foster inclusiveness. As Rumi reminds us, “there are a thousand ways to kneel and kiss the ground.”

Sand’s autism did not get identified until she was twenty-nine which means she spent almost thirty years misdiagnosed and misunderstood. She did not speak or walk until age two. As a crawler when a lot of kids become toddlers, she remained locked into either silence or screaming, often overturning the living room furniture with the force of a tsunami. She cried for hours on end—inconsolable and unreachable in her own unidentified world. The hugs we offered, the steady stream of words, the scent of my mother’s perfume, the lights flipped on, the constant noises, the jerk and whirl of motion rained down on her in torrents we never understood.

Now when my sister repeats herself ad nauseum I cannot help but think, payback is a—well, you know the expression. She writes:
The most major part of my autism is my perseveration, my need to constantly repeat things. I usually would not mean to repeat intentionally but it happens perpetually. This affects me in social situations and in the job world too, along with my other communication problems. The repetition is an aspect I honestly cannot help very well. I also have great difficulty explaining things, sharing information and conversing with others.

I do well with children now as an adult in terms of them understanding me. Adults often do not understand me and that leads to me feeling frustrated and agitated at times. On a positive note, I have been blessed to find a wonderful speech therapist who specializes in autism who helps me to communicate better, share information with others, develop conversational skills and enhance interactions. I take medications for my Asperger’s but I must be honest; it only helps some. It is my speech therapist, my occupational therapist and my dedicated supervising teacher at the school where I volunteer with children on the autism spectrum who are trying to make a difference for me.

I interpret the world differently and cope with everyday life situations differently due to my autism. I am thankful for the help I receive professionally and through my volunteer experiences.

One of the most poignant illustrations of how Sand interprets the world occurred last year when we went to an Expo on Autism at Antioch College in Keene. We attended a presentation by a woman with Asperger’s Syndrome who enumerated the symptoms Sand named. The physical pain of too much sensory stimulation, how viewing rapid-fire images literally hurts her eyes. How sudden noise disables her. How unpredictable motion unsettles her and can activate panic. What was fascinating is that as she spoke, she showed a rapid-fire barrage of powerpoint slides. Her service dog barked erratically and the woman flapped her hands and jerked her body. Within moments Sand leaned over and said, “This speaker is terrible.” I assured Sand I found her interesting so we stayed. I completely missed the cue that Sand was actually asking to go. It was horribly overstimulating for her.

That’s when I realized that for Sand, being with another person with autism is not necessarily helpful much less comforting. Sand’s world occurs at the same time but not on the same plane; the terrain is always rocky, the ground constantly shifts underfoot and the dark clouds we recognize as brimming with precipitation lurk over her head about to dump rain unannounced.

To greater and lesser degrees we all cope with uncertainty. Autistic or not, we attempt to control our environment to the best of our ability. We order our little corner of the universe by establishing routine and recognizing pattern. We habituate ourselves with morning coffee, the same route to work, the good-night phone call or kiss. We willingly inhabit consistency as if it were certainty. We do this to function without succumbing to panic or debilitating fear. As Secretary of Energy Steven Chu said recently on NPR, of course no one can guarantee a nuclear power plant will never have an accident or a plane will never crash. We assure ourselves with positive safety records. Otherwise we would never get in a car, or for that matter, take a breath.

The acuity with which my sister clings to routine reminds me we all need reassurance. We recalibrate by checking in with ourselves and each other. Here it is the very expressions of presence and care we offer one another during worship and social hour that help us feel connected. Religion, from religare, is about what re-fastens us. None of us wishes to drift isolated and alone. We want to feel tethered to the tree of life. Not constricted but lovingly held.

Being Sand’s sister is sometimes a deeply frustrating experience. I find myself far less patient than I wish to be. I get exasperated with her easily because I want to live in a world sculpted by empathy so when I bump into Sand’s inability to express it, ironically I lose my capacity to empathize with her. I have to remind myself Sand doesn’t choose to focus on herself because she values self-centeredness as a spiritual goal. She focuses on herself the way any creature experiencing an assault on the senses turns inward to self-protect, to survive.

The world of poetry, pathos, and unexpected delights many of us joyfully inhabit is part of a multiverse not a singular universe. There are not just other perspectives on this world, but other worlds co-existent with ours—rich with lessons in a language not our own. Amen.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

A Few Facts about Chocolate



African Mother Carrying Her Child
Artwork courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

"284,000 children in West Africa [are] working in hazardous conditions, many under forced labour, .. handling pesticides and chemicals without any protective equipment” - Stephen Knapp, Fair Trade Association of Australia.

Click here to Read more . . .